Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Personified.

I can understand how it might benefit a kid to inculcate their imaginations with somewhat cartoonish figures – people in children’s books are much more colorful and caricatured than their three-dimensional counterparts, and toymakers seem to find a degree of alien patina irresistible. Perhaps the imagery imbues our younger versions with a psychologically-constructive openness that frolicks in the face of an otherwise hostile world. I'm sure the likes of Peter Singer rejoice when animals are anthropomorphized to inspire empathy among their prospective masters and oppressors.

But in other cases, the motivation behind some of these illustrations and playthings is not immediately obvious. Why do the creators of most of my daughter’s books feel like it’s necessary to give smiles, wide-eyes, and blushing cheeks to the sun or a grouping of cumulus clouds? What value is there in making unworldly balls of flaming gases so amicable and adorable? I don’t expect my daughter to have an interaction with the sun (or any of the other stars, for that matter) in which a cold, arms-length distrust would be a gross disservice. The same goes for clouds that stare out at her with a rosy-red complexion and long eyelashes. (I’m not all that concerned that she’ll develop an unhealthy, introverted ambivalence to mundane meteorological fixtures.)

Today I noticed that Josephine has a large toy tape measurer. It’s misshapen, rectangular and orange – not all that unusual for child-like replicas of real-life objects. However, Fisher-Price decided to endow the tape measurer with eyes. And to be honest, that’s not all that offensive, even though I’d be materially disturbed to buy anything from Home Depot and find it had eyes after peeling back the packaging. The real oddity of this toy tape measurer is its over-sized cowboy boots. Is it just that I’m totally oblivious to some indisputable value in portraying common household tools as bronc-busting, gun-slinging wayfarers? For what exactly does that prepare our children?

It gets you thinking about the many cars that have been given faces and personalities (and all the ebullient films about them). Herbie, all the sequals and remakes of the Love Bug franchise, Knight Rider, the Pixar animated movie Cars. Maybe it's an obvious (and obviously conspiratorial) point to say these are the building blocks of "customer delight" so well-ingrained in our nascent consumers.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

How to take up a new language.

Language, like most things, is at its crystalline best when it’s unkempt, as though a history of bloodletting and less tactile persuasion had pooled at our feet with little regard for cognitive conveniences like structure, consistency, or clarity. Rustic and disorderly, like an old-fashioned peasant insurrection. Like a good stew. Like the universe, which sniffles at science and mere rationality as they throw paper airplanes at the sun. Of course, there is conjugation and syntax and no mild deficit of grammatical parameters for how we communicate, but I tend to favor the odd bits and anomalies.

I’ve been reminded of this resplendent disorder as I listen to our daughter cling to and rehearse every verb she hears from us that includes the word “up.” They’re surprisingly common, and so far, her repertoire includes usage such as …

The raccoon is stuck up in the tree.
Clean up the food I dropped on the floor.
Pick up the screwdriver and hand it to me.
Snap up my nightgown.

Her distinctive tendency towards the imperative aside, isn’t “up” completely unnecessary in these sorts of sentences? There’s one exception above, but for the others: wouldn’t they retain all their meaning without the embellishment? Josephine knows little English (and to be clear, she’s nowhere close to speaking the above sentences verbatim), yet one of the first things onto which she has latched is hollow and ineffectual. That's feeble economizing for someone with so little weight to throw around -- and twenty-two months seems too young for shadow boxing. Then again, maybe it’s the most prescient time for it, saving her best for opponents of genuine substance.

Isn’t there something wonderful in the color and texture added by these two humble characters, U & P? A little “rhetorical flourish” that is inexplicable and mystical.

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Children's poetry is linguistic subjugation.

Occasionally (very occasionally), I catch myself reading poetry to Josephine in a rare (very rare) moment of misguided, foolhardy tenderness. (I wanted to make sure y'all know that so I get proper credit for my reformed-savage sensitivity.)

Unfortunately, I'm all too frequently caught off-guard by the language gestapo. Sometimes it's stodgy Brits of the Ox-bridge mould applying end rhyme that runs counter to modern American diction. As I approach the end of the line, a surprising word emerges and I realize lyrical dexterity will be required to keep my daughter in a sing-song trance. . . my voice cranes and lilts to make the words match, but it usually just wobbles out sounding like some wavering nordic mutation (at best). At worst, it becomes absolutely preposterous and leaves a look of shame and disgrace on Josephine's face.

The latest offense came at the hands of my own countryman -- from Dr. Seuss, a New Englander:

"Who is this pet?
Say! He is wet.
You never yet met a pet, I bet
As wet as they let this wet pet get."

To be fair, Dr. Seuss is a family favorite, so I'm cautious in challenging him so openly. But since this poem was copyrighted in 2005 by Random House's "Dr. Seuss Enterprises" (rather than Dr. Seuss himself, who died in the 90s), I suspect I'm actually confronting a ghostwriter who's upholding the brand of the Dr. Seuss franchise for the benefit of the publisher and to earn prodigious loyalties for heirs. Besides, I'm not convinced it has the stylistic fingerprints of a Dr. Seuss poem that had been waiting to be published posthumously.

When I read the four simple lines quoted above, my ears find a rhyme in the words pet, wet, yet, met, bet -- to my aural interpretation, at least, they all sound exactly how they look. (Other people might hear something more poly-syllabic coming from my mouth: "Pehyat -- wehyat -- yehyat -- mehyat -- behyat," but even with the patent East Texas intonation, the effect is the same: each subsequent word crystallizes into tidy alignment.) Where I get tripped up is at the very end, with the word "get." I hear and speak "giht," which is employing a completely different vowel and is probably also a little more truncated than the drawl affected in the other words. Unless I contort my expression in the manner described above, any direct, straightforward rhyme is lost in my accent.

This always leaves me with a decision to make in a matter of milliseconds: do I submit to this egregious, patronizing assault on my native dialect, or do I defy convention and leave a bitter, gnawing buzz in our two pairs of ears as the rhyme falls flat? As a proud forebearer of regional idiosyncracies, indigenous eccentricities, and the like, I'm hoping to manually weld my daughter's synapses in as heavy-handed a way as possible, so I of course opt to disobey the mono-cultural tyranny, to deconstruct the exogenous, pseudo-colonial order and to honor local authenticity. And so on -- blah, blah, blah.

From here on out, Josephine and I will be limiting ourselves to brainy Southern poets (it might be difficult to draw the circle more narrowly and find cerebral Central/East Texas literati, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong on that count) or the free-form wordsmiths who are much less likely to meddle in the phonetic autonomy we proudly exercise. Any good suggestions, particularly for the former?

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Sheriff's Report Number 446, by Sheriff Ralph Billings

In my hometown newspaper, the local sheriff has a column that’s one of the longest features in each weekly edition. I believe it’s syndicated to other weeklies in the area as well. In a single breath (and with very little trace of irony), his writing documents both the innocence and the underbelly of small town life. He'll humorlessly describe the calf that got loose in the same paragraph as the meth lab that caught fire in the back room of a daycare.

From a Sheriff's Report published last summer, I transcribed the following text verbatim. The fact that I spent that much time typing it is a testament to how much I enjoy the column, but I got an interesting lesson in nostalgia shortly after I’d completed the transcription: at first, I was gloating over this sacrificial exercise – how I’d uncovered an arcane relic of rural Texas and made it available to the world online -- but then a quick Google search led me to the internet archives of this guy’s articles – and they’re even available from multiple links (like this one: Teague Chronicle) . . . If you dare to read other installments of the column, you’ll see that the one I've included below is not at all unusual – they’re all like this.

So, beyond that introduction, I’m going to resist the temptation for color commentary and just let the piece speak for itself.

Sheriff's Report Number 446
Sheriff Ralph Billings
Teague Chronicle


TPD Sykora arrests motorist on 6th, Anderson County Warrant. Wade Harrison arrests another, US-84, three City of Fairfield Warrants. FPD to Hemale/Shemale Troubles, KFC parking lot. TPD Martin to Pecan, Mother/Son Troubles. Dep. Harrison to report of loud party, Southern Oaks.

A few days ago we had an inmate carried to the ER due to seizures. He has a history of this problem, and other inmates stated that he fell to the floor with a seizure. The ER located bleeding present on the brain so he was helicoptered to Tyler. Later information of the next day indicates that he was struck by another inmate, went to the floor. Now on a ventilator in Tyler Hospital in serious shape.

Deputy Elom checks on welfare of resident, FCR-271. Deputies Robert Elom and Elena Tayor change flat tire for stranded Lady, IH-45. 911 Bounce advises of Grassfire Troubles, US-79 at LCR 542, Leon County S.O. advised of same. Loose cow, Hwy. 164, Leon County S.O. advised of same. Large number of differing calls reporting reckless drivers, passing on shoulder, tailgating, running over a hundred, etc. I guess the moon was just in the wrong phase this weekend.

City Worker called out, S. 11th, Teague. Wortham VFD and Mexia EMS to West Brazos, someone fell. Goats reported being attacked by Pit Bulls, FCR 536. DPS Adams to accident, Donie, driver intoxicated, in Jail now. TPD sykora arrests man at Dap’s, Mary Jane. Dep. Harrison to FCR-949, someone knocking on window, whistling to open up. FEMS to Peachtree, husband in sever pain. Lady with brand new cell phone dials 911 . . ... Yep, it works!

Transformer blows out at Bobo’s Nursery between Buffalo and Jewett, 911 comes in here, call transferred. Hope it’s up and running again, the little begonias and periwinkles with a smile in every bloom! Mother/Grown Son Troubles, FCR-959, Mister Elom spots the problem real quick . . . . The house just too small. Dew VFD to grassfire, Mile 189. Deputy Aldrich to trailer stolen, building burglarized, items stolen, FCR-520.

Deputies Shipley and Yancy to/from Gurney Unit, prisoner transport. Also assisted with mental commitment, as did Deputies McClelland and Walker. Dep. Diana Willis to FM-416, fishing gear stolen. Brown, skinny dog tearing up Lady’s trash on Comal, Wortham. THDEMS and Teague VFD to possible stroke, US-84, Teague. Elderly man having many troubles lately, twice reported to have pulled a gun on others, in a scuffle with FPD, tried to take one of their guns away . . ..Pretty serious deal. Believe it to be a dementia problem getting worse daily. Has always been a good man, never a problem with anyone or for anyone, now, all of that has changed.

Troubles over a dog, FCR 296, first believed stolen . . .. later came back home. Two traveling salesmen, selling meat out of their pickup, causing concerns with rural dweller. Deputy Cory House to Hemale/Shemale Troubles, Shemale barricaded in room, Hemale drags her out of closet, begins whupping on her while she’s trying to talk on 911. Hemale arrested, Assault Family Violence , Interfere with Emergency Phone Call, plus an Outstanding Warrant for Hot Checkin’.

THDEMS to Main, someone turning blue, choking on a cookie. Later found out this led to death. A most unfortunate occurrence. Deputies Aldrich and House to Lakeshore Drive, young Lady wanting to leave a residence, Boyfried won’t let her. Car wrecks, hits fence, DPS Putz to same, FCR-1080. Traveling man off the Interstate making peach sales staff very uncomfortable. FPD B. Billy Barlow to same. Deputy Howerton to Oak Forest, trash cans reported stolen. Two customers reported at McDonalds threatening to fight with guns and knives, FPD to same.

Injured fawn carried to animal rehab. TPD Martin jails motorist, local Teague Warrant. FPD to Oak on report of Assaulted Lady. FPD Kindon arrests one of two kinsmen having troubles with each other, Interfere with Emergency Call.

Two young daughters and waitress Judy Jones pull a surprise Birthday Celebration on Paston Ken Pruitt of First Baptist Church, Fairfield at Sam’s Restaurant on Wednesday. FPD advised of missing 13 year old, Anderson Lane. Troubles on South Lincoln, caller advises husband struck wife, disconnected phone and disabled her car. Lady 911’s, truck broke down, in shade under bridge, IH-45 by Love’s, kids pelting rocks at the truck from atop the bridge.

Doctor Chopper coming into Wortham Football Field to pick up patient being brought to same, Wortham VFD standing by scene. FEMS, Fairfield VFD and DPS Curtis Putz to Mile 200, motorcycle wrecked out after striking tire carcass in road. TPD Martin to report of drunken man causing problems on Ash. Also to key locked in vehicle on Barbara. Dep. Aldrich ascertaining if all is secure at residence on FM-1580.

Loose cow, FM-2547. Butler and Fairfield VFD’s to structure fire, US-84. Al and Jo Samons down for a visit from Dallas, both looking great. Another report of the Harris County Jail Phone Scam occurs in north part of County, handled just right, did not accept collect call, did not hit the Star button on phone. Mother fins Runaway son, FCR-711, but he bolts again. TPD Martin to report of four fighting on Atwood. Oil company cutting man’s fence, letting cows out, FM 2547.

6 cows out, FM-416 in Navarro County. All available units to IH-45 Coffee Shop parking lot, folks reported fighting, windshield broken, baseball bats being brandished. Flat bed trailer reported stolen, S. 3rd, Wortham PD to same. Railroad arms drop on top of Lady’s car, Wortham, WPD to same.

Started this column with information on one Inmate assaulting another in Jail, one of the two in serious shape in Hospital. Glad to report he is up, walking around, talking, fixing to be released.

Congratulations Ray Hallmark on receiving 60 Year Award as Masonic Member. A super nice guy, one of the best you’ll ever meet. Always upbeat with a smile on his face. Never crotchety, dour, or cross. Has brought much sunshine into many lives. FEMS to FCR-502, many dizzy, can’t move.

Cooler temperatures much appreciated and enjoyed by all.

ALL READERS-EFFECTIVE 7-16-09 THE BURN BAN IS BACK IN EFFECT.

Saturday, March 6, 2010

I have very little patience for retirees.

This is a new discovery for me. But before I explain, let me pause for a moment to put this irritable epiphany in perspective.

I just returned from a (business) trip to Orlando last week. For a while now, I’ve known that business travelers are some of the most miserable, slimy, bitter, and generally tactless creatures on the polished face of our bubbling planet; in fact, they might be one of the most socially degenerate classes in human history. (Dante would’ve devoted one of his circles to them.) A more favorable view would cast them in the light of new age, middle-class pioneers far away from home and perennially endangered by the threats of their estranged cohabitants. But I prefer to think of them as somewhat akin to modern day sailors, hopping from port to port to inflict debauchery and baseless, antagonistic narcissism on unsuspecting civilians. Mayhem is their currency.

In case you need evidence (you probably don’t) of the world-weary desperation that unites these transient professionals, just flip through the in-flight magazine on your next plane ride and see who advertising executives think these consumers are (or more precisely: what the advertisers think they want). The most common and prominent pieces showcase dating services, the Blue Man Group, and national steakhouse chains; physical therapy, “world-class” hospitals, and a whole host of pain treatment centers; discount cigars, wax museums, exercise machines, cheap bourbon, plastic surgery, overseas manufacturing, casinos in New Mexico . . . And what is the common thread that ties this all together to make one captive, monolithic opportunity for these marketers? It's the business travelers.

One full page ad was was devoted to a cosmetic dentistry enterprise, whose practitioners boasted the following:

■ Dental implants
■ In-house ceramist
■ Advanced sedation alternatives [Personally, I’d prefer the “advanced sedation alternatives” to be administered on the tarmac shortly before takeoff]
■ 48 hr turnaround [. . . in case you want to squeeze in some dental work while you’re briefly in town on business?]
■ Limousine service for out-of-town guests

All that should be enough to persuade you about these coarse, frightening people whose spectral bodies are forever steeped in the chemical pungency of jet fuel exhaust.

But now I'm convinced business travelers might have found their match in the Geezer set, a rival tribe who roams the terminal (albeit more slowly) and tries my patience in new and creative ways. Quite distinct from the uptight and angst-ridden wandering capitalists, the senior citizens’ strategy is to deploy an unbearable smugness, and they do so to great effect. Although they can get rowdy and cranky sometimes too, they are normally characterized by the serene, unending respite they project. They show total disregard for the rules long-established by the mile-accruing business elite – namely, the tepid, atomized social distance demanded of others.

First among a long list of complaints: their conversations involve too much volume. (Only the naive would reduce this to a symptom of old-age hearing loss; that’s just an excuse to put their oh-so-idyllic lifestyle on flagrant display). They’re either on the phone with a sister, broadcasting their private predicaments and counseling clichés, or they’ve just bumped into another dreamy retiree couple and they’re sharing in life's achievements. (It usually starts out innocently enough: "I just love that book you’re reading. Don’t you just love that book? My book club read it a few months ago! I hear Oprah loved it – she said it was the emotional masterpiece of the century and it just moved her to tears. Don’t you know that’s just exactly the way it used to be? I can remember when I was a little girl growing up on a farm in Pennsylvania. . .")

Despite the swooning, newfound kinship among strangers, it’s hardly surprising that their book clubs shared a best-selling autobiography in common – but that’s not the point, of course. The book is but a Trojan horse in their bombastic subterfuge, a vehicle for a ceaseless chain of anecdotes, philosophies, and self-adoration. We'd be all too fortunate if the heartfelt commonalities began and ended with the book, but don’t forget that these are seasoned experts, trained in the very sort of conversational acrobatics that allow them to deftly segue from the autobiography to their nostalgic morals to the subtle psychological sensitivities of their Boston Terrier vs. their Bichon Frise (not to be mistaken for a kind of lettuce).

And then, within minutes, they 've reached the promiseland, having at some point found an excuse to show cell phone pictures of their grandchildren drooling so heavily that you wonder what exactly accounts for the shimmer on the keypad below. They talk about the fateful eminence of their children (casually trotting out proof like a five-bedroom house in the hills or ownership of a popular city-wide pizza franchise that's the "best in town”). This was where it was headed from the start, and all parties involved knew that all along.

The last retired couple I came across even went so far as to hand out their own glossy “business” cards with grainy images of bluebonnets in the background behind their names. They looked like they came from a dot-matrix printer, but stopped short of serrated edges. Since these people are retired and don’t really have a business to promote, however, I guess they're more accurately called “social cards” – a medium for social networking, like the closest old people could ever get to Facebook. But they’ll never see these strangers again; they'll never follow up with them, they'll never cross paths again. And that’s what’s so mystical to me, to see how largely positioning figures into even the most fleeting, purposeless interactions, when nothing's at stake.

As if all that wasn’t enough, I have one more illustration of the nuisance that stems from retirees and their glib, publically-aired hedonism: Can anyone tell me why they must always dress like they’re headed to the Bahamas? What leads to such an in-grained affinity for pastel polos, khaki shorts, Cuban shirts and anything saturated with caricatured hibiscus flowers? Clearly, hats, caps and sunglasses are also a must. I would wager that the Bahamas are rarely their true destination – only a small fraction of passengers in an any given airport end up in beachside towns. Truth be told, they’re returning from a mundane visit to see their grandchildren, or even if the ocean was at some point involved, they're probably just coming back from their timeshare in Panama City or a geriatric cruise to the Keys . . . nothing nearly as adventurous or as glamorous as they’d have you believe.

Given this torrent of deception, I'm forced to assume their clothes have very little practical utility and are instead a taunting token of merciless, intergenerational vitriol: "Keep toiling away you young and pathetic peasants, we're on a perpetual vacation!" It’s just one more way in which they subject the rest of us to a steady, self-satisfied deluge of their manufactured enthusiasm. But of course, I can't pretend their tactics are ineffective -- after all, I'm truly envious, and more than a bit resentful, of their relaxation.

I’m here to tell you there’s simply no refuge in America’s airports. Whether it’s the hostile vigor of business travelers or the saccharine braggadocio of nomadic retirees, it all makes for a very toxic social combination. But far beyond the security check points, baggage carousels, and Terminal Es, I don’t think an entire generation of senior citizens is lost. I find hope in my two 80-year old grandmothers, who I don’t think have travelled anywhere outside of a three-hour car drive in the last decade or two. Now there's a humble, honorable lifestyle for the elderly -- my grandmothers are like visionaries, investing only in their local community, keeping their carbon footprints miniscule . . . of course, it’d be nice to think that this spartan behavior could be explained by deeply-held convictions about social responsibility, but instead, they’re more like the inverse of compassionate yuppies: they have all the behavioral trappings of an ethical, non-materialistic lifestyle without the dogmatic foundation on which to base it.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Tet(anus) Offensive

As my daughter grows older and passes each developmental milestone (“inch-stone” would be more fitting, as I suggested a couple posts ago), the occasional visit to the pediatrician’s office comes with the territory. I’ve had the mind-bending misfortune of accompanying her and Jenny on two occasions now; let me explain why it’s such a supremely bizarre place.

At the pediatrician, reality is inverted. All the standard rules of the medical profession are turned on their head. Decorating devices that would otherwise seem out of place in the hyper-formal world of medicine are employed with the greatest deliberation: stripes, polka-dots, and primary colors, for example, are all unusually prominent; wayfinding fixtures (e.g. signs, door numbers, room names) are bright, bubbly, and cartoonish. Around every corner is another dreamlike setting that could've been spawned out of Lewis Carroll’s hallucinatory visions.

On our first visit, I asked how I could find the bathroom, to which the nurse provided a tentative, open-ended response, “Well, we have a big bathroom and a little bathroom – which do you want?” I was instantly confounded by many aspects of that question, so I’m afraid I interrupted her with my preferences before she finished responding; I really didn’t need more details - all I could think about was ducking dramatically through the little bathroom’s doorway, crouching to my knees as I pinched my fingertips together to turn the microscopic faucet handles. And I’m sure little fairies would’ve been there to dry my hands with the sparkling breeze from their fluttering wings.

To up the ante during our next visit, we were jettisoned from the waiting room to a new room, its walls festooned with Star Wars posters and shadow boxes full of alien figurines. Plastic model spaceships and more aliens hung from every square inch of the ceiling. (Maybe I’m an outlier here, but the persistent anxiety associated with medical appointments was scarcely eased by alien creatures and their extra-terrestrial deformities. Instead, the worst medical side effects imaginable took turns clawing their way through my head). I can’t speak for Josephine, but if I went to my doctor and found a seemingly unhealthy fascination with sci-fi space mythology, I would be more than a little concerned about his/her commitment to the Hippocratic oath.

The terminology is way out there too. It’s safe to say there’s a lot more coo-ing than would be typical for my own doctor visits. When infant Josephine goes to the doctor, however, there are entire conversations held between physician and patient with rare utterance of any sensible English vocabulary, each party making the most frugal use of consonants. There are lots of official references to “prickles” and “toesies”, “toofers” and “bumbles”, and all manner of gobbledy gook, with hardly a trace of scientific terms. I’m still not quite sure what the pediatrician meant when she referred to Josephine’s “snorkies,” but in one of the few oddities that I actually appreciated, Josephine’s doctor simply referred to her shots collectively as “the meanness”. Her sweet Southern accent gave it a dainty gloss that I assure you is only attainable when one’s vocal chords are cured in a steady marinade of iced tea and pimiento cheese.

The vaccination portion of each visit is particularly troubling for me. In general, I wouldn’t say I’m an avid fan of sharp metal objects piercing flesh, but the gory pain of the stab is just the beginning. Now I’ve found another reason to loathe shots -- just take a look at a few of the dubious ingredients that go into concocting a common vaccine in the lab (according to the Dr. Robert Sears Vaccine Book):

Chick embryo proteins
Fetal cow blood serum
Monkey kidney cells

Monkey guts? The blood of an unborn calf? Throw in a frog’s heart and some cat eyeballs and you have yourself a bona fide witches brew. All those years of education, internships, and residencies, yet the average M.D. hasn't evolved much past the same elemental resources used in the lore and mysticism of several centuries ago. Granted, they're mixing their prescriptions at a more granular level now -- and without the bubbling cauldron. Ohh, and there is the minor point that the newer way does seem to work, whereas witches have a less honorable track record.

Pediatric sorcery and witchcraft aside, there are more ethical concerns at hand: I’m horribly disappointed that Austin, one of the bastions of progressive citizenry in our fair nation-state, has yet to enlist a doctor who will perform vegan vaccinations (you know, something without all these cruel, carnivorous inputs). Can’t some pharma chemist somewhere figure out a soy-based shot for measles, mumps, and rubella? If veganism has taught us nothing else, it's that there's no limit to the wonders you can squeeze out of a humble soybean as long as you’re willing to process it enough.

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Only the Occasional Whiff of Patchouli

A couple days ago, Josephine turned six months. We did nothing to celebrate because the last quarter has not been the most harmonious season between Josephine and her parents. But because we control the purse strings, Jenny and I did recently treat ourselves to a fairly ambitious vacation to Northern California, albeit with l’enfant terrible in tow. It has been about a year since we’ve had a true getaway, but when we planned the trip a few months ago, we mistakenly assumed that a child who is more or less serene at three months old would maintain a similar disposition over the course of the subsequent three months. Ha! [I'm laughing with tears in my eyes.]

Chalk it up to another hazard of naivete for first-time parents. Here are other things I learned in Northern California, some thankfully unrelated to parenthood:
  • There are more Priuses than people in Berkeley.

  • Berkeley has gone commercial, and its archetypical acolytes have fled to surrounding communities like Sebastopol, where stores selling locally handmade glassware and pottery are exceedingly common, often advertising their wares as so-called “functional art.” My best guess is that, in this case, "functional" means “can be smoked out of.”

  • In the wine country, the natives feel there’s no limit to the ways in which oak wine barrels can be repurposed with apishly stylistic effect; it’s the landscaping equivalent of that particular Napa/Sonoma font that proprietors feel they can put on signs to provide their establishment with instant cachet.

  • Of all the temptations we passed up in the wine country, from high vintage tasting rooms to the French Laundry and other fine eateries of national repute, none seemed more irresistibly alluring than the occasional daycare on the side of the road.

  • One shouldn't be surprised when you spend the night in a mountain town crammed in the middle of several national forests, only to find out that all the rooms are booked up by hundreds of people from the park service, all of whom are in town to eradicate the surrounding forest of marijuana.

  • “Where time stands still” is not a promising motto for your lodging for the night

  • As it turns out, there’s little you can do to reason with a six month old

  • For civil engineers in California, any indication that lanes are merging is an afterthought. (The arrows are usually painted on the pavement after you pass through the stop light, roughly 15 ft before the lane disappears.)

  • Beach towns have beach trash and river towns have river trash, all washed up from the Summer of Love (or at least the ever-elusive dream of its renaissance).

  • Many hardened hippies are ultimately irritable and difficult.

  • Shirts are no longer in vogue for men in offbeat towns of Sonoma County. Guerneville, with its above average ruffians per capita, can be particularly harrowing after dark.

  • I was astonished to find that Northern California is still the sort of place where people drive down main street with country music blaring out their rolled-down windows. You don't have to go to far out of the Bay Area to be in the backwoods.

  • On the other hand, rural gas stations there stock bottles of organic apple juice sourced from local orchards, and by "local," I mean the orchards that are located within that same county.

  • Coffeeshops in otherwise unassuming small towns carry books like the one I noticed titled “10 Minute Activist”

  • Sometimes churches have to be converted into natural foods stores.

"The Referendum," by Tim Kreider

I read an amusing article a couple weeks ago. Here's an excerpt:

“Most of my married friends now have children, the rewards of which appear to be exclusively intangible and, like the mysteries of some gnostic sect, incommunicable to outsiders. In fact it seems from the outside as if these people have joined a dubious cult: they claim to be much happier and more fulfilled than ever before, even though they live in conditions of appalling filth and degradation, deprived of the most basic freedoms and dignity, and owe unquestioning obedience to a capricious and demented master.

"I have never even idly thought for a single passing second that it might make my life nicer to have a small, rude, incontinent person follow me around screaming and making me buy them stuff for the rest of my life. [Note to friends with children: I am referring to other people’s children, not to yours.] But there are also moments when some part of me wonders whether I am not only missing the biological boat but something I cannot even begin to imagine — an entire dimension of human experience undetectable to my senses, like a flatlander scoffing at the theoretical concept of sky.

"But I can only imagine the paralytic terror that must seize my friends with families as they lie awake calculating mortgage payments and college funds and realize that they are locked into their present lives for farther into the future than the mind’s eye can see. Judging from the unanimity with which parents preface any gripe about children with the disclaimer, “Although I would never wish I hadn’t had them and I can’t imagine life without them,” I can’t help but wonder whether they don’t have to repress precisely these thoughts on a daily basis."

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Sims vs. Sims

I’m so over Josephine. Everyone else is busy fawning over her, but I’m fed up with it. Come on, people – spare the sap . . . I think it’s high time I get some more attention around here.

Here are a couple obvious reasons why I'm more deserving:

1) I’m much smarter and wittier than Josephine.
2) I’m way more articulate; for crying out loud, she can’t even talk -- she only grunts and moans, so that’s a pretty low bar to beat.
3) I’m arguably better looking. And besides, if it weren’t for me, she’d be at least 50% less cute. Where do you think she got all those attractive features and adorable mannerisms anyway? They didn’t magically appear one day out of nowhere; it's no coincidence that I’m pretty lovable and adorable myself.
4) I’m more agile, and I could definitely beat her in a foot race. Meanwhile, everyone gets ecstatic when she sits up or rolls over, a trick most dogs would’ve easily mastered by this age too. It was only a few months ago that everyone was getting so worked up when she lifted her hand up to her mouth, and . . . [suspense building] . . . accidentally latched onto her fist to pacify herself. If you ask me, that's not a very impressive feat for the same species that has harnessed electricity, designed supersonic aircraft, penned epic novels, etc. If you're going to offer praise for the basest demonstrations of manual dexterity, that's fine -- I just suggest you reserve that sort of acclaim for lesser primates.

If the disparity stopped at praise for her trivial achievements, I could maybe overlook it, but I'm most disgruntled by the attention she gets despite some clearly despicable iniquities. Since when do we embrace (much less encourage!) people who sleep away most of their day? And when she’s not sleeping, she’s usually either gorging her gluttonous addictions or bawling her eyes out -- neither of which seem very healthy either. Do you really expect to convince me that someone who only eats, sleeps, and cries is “soooo precious”? That sounds more like an archetypical case of manic depression; I frankly believe she belongs in a psych ward, in a room with padded walls. (Come to think of it, no wonder they make bumpers for the interior perimeter of a crib).

The last place Josephine needs to be is in the doting gaze and embrace of some obsessed family member who is merely enabling her mental illness, reinforcing her bad habits and her other severe shortcomings. Someone – someone! – needs to hold her to higher standards. I look forward to the day when somebody finally takes advantage of all this face time we get with her and sternly exhorts, “Josephine, Welcome to the Human Race, now pull yourself together.”

Monday, September 7, 2009

"Rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated."

I'm not one for famous quotes -- at least, I haven't been drawn to them since my grand oratory phase back in 7th or 8th grade. So I hesitated to use one in the title here; after all, deference to our cultural hegemons runs counter to one's subversive instincts. However, Mark Twain is an iconic character on the order of Hemingway . . . no matter how mainstream, he doubtlessly merits serious attention. I oblige.

As of late -- over the past 5 months to be precise -- I've been besieged by a series of daily inconveniences, and although they have subjected me to no shortage of sacrifice and suffering, nuisance and annoyance, I have (just barely) survived. In my heroic insistence to cling on to the frail shreds of my life as they dangle, graciously and miraculously, from the firmament, I have been too busy to mind my blog entries, much to the dismay of the millions who read this blog every week. You've heard nary a word in the last few months. And for that, I can only blame my infant daughter, who has effectively left a deluge of heartache and longing in the wake of her birth.

At this point in the blog, I considered punctuating these sentiments with something profound like "I’ve been too consumed by the caustic art of everyday living to devote mindtime to the regenerative tonic of reflection," but that seemed inaccessible and fantastically overwrought, and truth be told, I’ve still been writing and brainstorming on the margins of my daily compulsions, building a backlog of posts to prepare for rapidfire release . . . I just haven't had time to organize them into posts . . . Until now. So please, stand back, and cover your eyes and ears.

In the meantime, please feel free to visit the link to my very own Home & Garden blog to the right (Exercise in Domesticity); I've been more active on that front over the past few months, so don't be surprised if you find things that blow your mind and open you up to a whole new consciousness.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Eighth Generation

An unseemly cabal in our 159th year of Texan recalcitrance -- scarred by the southern sun, searing in the white-hot ashen earth.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Suitable gentlemen (Read: Anyone in a tunic's all right by me.)

Now here are three outstanding young men, all clean shaven and well-appointed . . . Okay, okay two of them have a faint trace of facial hair, but it's really too thin to count. Overall, you can tell they're good kids; these guys are going places.

Two important rules for my daughter

This is a fateful, hardly bearable moment in the unwritten history of my life. Today was the first time that I fully crossed paths with the agonizing sacrifices one makes when he places the wellbeing of his child before his own hopes/dreams/desires.

The issue is shaving. My instinct for self-preservation regularly reminds me, in a shrill and insistent voice, that I should avoid shaving with every grain of willpower I can muster. Yet, I also don't think my daughter should trust men with suspicious facial hair (and ultimately, all facial hair is suspicious in one light or another) . . . so I stand face to face with a fraught, tangled decision. Do I impose such cruel strictures on my daily habits, or do I risk the life prospects of my own offspring by setting a bad example and getting her accustomed to unshaven men? Well, like any good parent who values discipline, I think it's best to go ahead and establish some ground rules for her:

1) Beware of all men with facial hair. Keep your distance. Do not speak to them. Their slothfulness is exceeded only by their wreckless disregard for human life. They cannot be trusted. Above all, do not love or respect men with facial hair. They are like feral cats. Every fiber of their Godless, hopeless depravity can be counted on their face.

Except for your father.

While I'm at it, why not throw in a bonus rule? (I'm exercising the inalienable parental right/responsibility to develop new, unprecedented rules on an ad hoc basis.)

2) You are not allowed to wear Ugg boots. They are a stain on modern society. My heart dies a little each time someone puts on a pair. In the history of mankind, few fashion designs have been so unflattering to the human form -- in that vein, Uggs are rivalled only by leisure suits, turtleneck sweaters, and coonskin caps. (Toupees just missed the cut). They are disgraceful. No one anywhere ever has looked at the abominable snowman's ankles and said "Ohh mon dieu that's a great look!"

I really don't intend to offend any of my Ugg-wearing readership by openly castigating the trend. But I've been wanting to say this for years -- I had to put up with it in London, with the Northeastern brats at Emory, and now with the UT freshmen. I was certain this meant it was on its way out, an inevitable pariah of the motley shoe sector, but then I read this blog where a mother said the following: “The other girls her age all wear Uggs. In fact, as far as I can see, every girl, of every age, everywhere, now wears Uggs.” I simply broke down in tears. The blog is here http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/12/extraordinary-people/, and if I can store up the energy, I have a whole 'nother reason to rant about the content of this post in particular. For now, let's all just hope that Uggs don't last another decade or so to usher my precious, sensible daughter into her pre-teen years.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Happiest Businessman on the Flight

The engines on a 737 must be a lot louder than what I’m used to; as the plane was taking off this afternoon, the high decibel whooshing starting to put me to sleep, but as soon as I realized it was the noise that was so hypnotic, a dreamlike image immediately began to crystalize in my head . . . it was a giant-sized profile of a greasy-haired pediatrician, remarkably similar to Dr. Harvey Karp (pictured), floating over my shoulder and vigorously shh-ing into my oversized adult ears. I was immediately jarred back into consciousness, as the very thought of his sweater-vest-and-tie ensemble was startling enough to return me to a fully alert and on-guard state.

(Ever since we watched the Happiest Baby on the Block, I've been wondering if the infants had enough fashion sense for the vest to somewhat offset his otherwise earnest efforts at calming them.)

Although I appreciated the sheer survivalism embodied by his theories, I’ve now resolved that that was my first and last video on babies. I can’t bear the future risk of imagining myself being swaddled by him. Or maybe I should just take cues from this. For the next flight, I could insist on laying on my side/stomach while I ask another passenger to jostle me vigorously as a calming technique.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

The Name Hunt 2

Not everyone can claim to be named after an action-movie celebrity from the 60s and 70s. But, in a moment of boundless and breathtaking inspiration, my parents decided to name me after Sean Connery. They were moved by his deep and introspective work in classic arthouse films like GoldFinger, Dr. No, and Thunderball. What better way to motivate a child to the zenith of human achievement, those two crowning experiences of all great figures: philandery and international crimefighting intrigue. Naturally, I was hoping that we could continue this meaningful tradition by giving our firstborn child a name from the subsequent generation of action heroes. I even had a shortlist:

Sylvester Sims
Arnold Sims
Mel Sims
Bruce Sims
Harrison Sims
Keanu Sims
Jean-Claude van Sims
Steven Seagal Sims (my personal favorite)

So many of those have a great ring to them, don’t they? But of course, as fate would have it, we found out we’re having a girl, and there aren’t many good female action heroes that I can think of. If you can think of any, please send names so we can revive our hopes of letting the Sean Connery precedent live on. Otherwise, I’m afraid we’re going to have to start with a clean slate.

Introducing the Blog Baron . . .

After just 10 or 15 posts on the Itsy-bitsy-est Post-Marxist Subversive, I've decided to start a couple more blogs to add to my increasingly influential internet dynasty. I couldn't resist -- my greed got the best of me -- and if all falls into place, I shall very soon be like a virtual Andrew Carnegie of the blog industry, building a vast empire of (verbal) wealth and (satirical) exploitation to add (figurative) jewels to my crown. In a relentless effort to consolidate my power and expand my monopoly, I fully intend to plunder natural resources; hopefully, I'll also get to lie, cheat, steal, and oppress some proles while I'm at it.

So, with brazen disregard for public server capacity, I'm incorporating these two new blogs into the franchise:

1) An Exercise in Domesticity: As many of you know, for the past year an unhealthy chunk of my time away from work has been devoted to yardwork. In addition to wanting to share the raw wonder of picking fresh food from my backyard, I've been taking pictures of the evolution in hopes of one day being able to look back and feel like there's enough differentiation to have made all this painstaking effort worth it. I also wanted to provide visual aids to all of you who have had to bear with me as I belabor the details but have yet to see much vivid documentation of what's been going on. So follow the link to the right to get caught up. (By the way, I've just begun this and I'm steadily uploading pictures that date as far back as early 2008, but I'll try to catch up to real-time as soon as possible.)

2) Reasonably Certain Signs of the End Times: It's ironic . . . it's outrageous . . . and then, apocalypse! The End of Days have never been zanier. But don't get your hopes up; for now, this really is just a pilot. (Thought I'd take it for a spin w/o too much of a commitment or anything too serious.) What I'm trying to do here is create a running list of life's minor atrocities. Check out the link to the right to see what I've got so far . . . feel free to contribute your own via comments, and I'll give you due credit. Unless they're lame.

Of course, because I'm a veritable tycoon now, I won't have much time to be directly involved in my new ventures, so you should expect even less regular posts than what you get on here.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

The Clarksville Massacre of 2009

The setting seemed innocent enough at the time. We were having brunch with some friends at a café in a tranquil, patrician neighborhood just west of downtown. (What could be more disarming than brunch?) Some girls from a local crew squad had just moored their boats down by the canal and sauntered in for a meal. (What could be more placid and genteel than crew?) In came a nice family with a small toddler, ribbons in her hair and a bright pink heart embroidered on her miniature t-shirt.

Only the trained eye could recognize the foreshadowing of doom and peril, a threat that was waiting, literally, right around the corner.

Ignorant of the latent danger, the toddler’s parents had dressed her in a pair of tiny leather shoes with soles that somehow were designed to let out a shrill squeak with every step she took. And she was prone to wander, so as they waited in line to order, incessant squeaking echoed throughout the building. She tripped over the rope line. She started crying. But, otherwise, everything seemed to be going fairly well . . . the family ordered at the counter and disappeared to their table in another part of the café.

Then, it all went awry when the toddler and her family started to leave, opening the door to walk out past the patio seating. All at once, the looming terror became brutally apparent -- right outside the door, there was the attacker, waiting, lurking: a Basset hound tied to the leg of a table. Though I don't get the sense Basset hounds are generally known for their vicious instincts, as soon as you introduce a couple small leathery things that move erratically and squeak at just the right pitch to bring out the bloodthirsty beast in any domesticated animal, all bets are off. The hound lunged forward, the child began to scream, pandemonium ensued. For a moment there, it was like time stood still. Thankfully, just milliseconds before the gore and bloodletting, the pet’s owner stepped in and restrained the dog when she realized that he had mistaken the child’s feet for play toys. But it was a close call, nonetheless.

Squirrels & Seasonal Eczema: A Maternal Opera (of Sorts)

A thread (verbatim) from the AustinMamas discussion group, in all its frayed and glorious disorder . . . a real tour de force embodying the struggles of modern day motherhood:

Original message from Meghan to set the stage for high drama:
"So, do you think that if I dust my succulents with cayenne that the squirrels will stop eating it? they are munchin' on my aloe (which I know has GOT to be giving them the runs), but also the birdseed that is coming from my neighbors upstairs. I dusted with cinnamon today to rid the ants that have shown up recently. you should have seen them eating the neighbors jack-o-lanterns. Times they must be a rough out in the trees, maybe the lack of rain? I've never seen them like this and we've lived here for years. hmmm, thoughts?"

First response, from Cynthia to Meghan:
"In the past I've used cayenne on my tomatoes and peppers and it has worked well. However...It did not work on my jack-o-lantern pumpkin!They knawed through it in 3 days, a week before I had planned to carve it. GRRRR. I hate the tree rodents!"

Second response (or bizarre pseudo-soliloquy number one), from Elizabeth to others:
"So far, knock wood, the owl is working to keep them from gnawing the trampoline net. I wonder how much longer that will last...They do seem to be much more frantic in their squirrel burying this year, but maybe that's my imagination."

Third response, from Arden to Elizabeth (sustaining the tangent):
"I agree, they're totally frantic this year. Every morning on my way to work I almost run over a squirrel or two, because they're racing around so fast in the middle of the road, looking for the next nut burial spot.They ate our pumpkin too. Strangely, despite that and the two hammocks they've destroyed, I still sorta like them."

Fourth response (or bizarre pseudo-soliloquy number two), from Nina to others:
"i am prejudiced against squirrels as well. anyone else see the hysterical blackadder episode about squirrels? i love blackadder. or rather, i loved him."

Fifth response, from Jen A to Meghan (in a totally hopeless effort to stay on topic and answer the original question):
"crushed dried red thai pepper worked great for us (be careful not to get it on yourself! Stuff burns.) I crushed the peppers in an envelope and put it in a parmesan/pepper shaker with big holes. If what you are putting it on is a bit wet it will stick better. And they do a crazy spicy dance if they do eat it :-) Kept them off my succulents, they seemed to remember for a little while."

Sixth response, from Heather to others (immediately dashing Jen A's foolhardy attempts):
"Maybe the squirrels are crazy because we're going to have a hard winter.? "

Seventh response, from Claire to Heather (as Claire projects her authority):
"farmer's almanac says it's going to be extra cold and dry this winter. "

Eighth response, from Elizabeth to Claire (as Elizabeth breaks down):
"But I want lots of snow!!!"

Ninth response, from Claire to Elizabeth (with Claire, ever wise and calm, consoling Elizabeth):
"You must have that tantrum every year, living down here :) I miss snow. Sometimes I contemplate going to visit my friend in Boston in the depths of winter just to get a bit of "real" winter. "

Tenth response, from Elizabeth to Claire (as she reflects on a troubled past):
"Yes, we didn't even get a good ice storm last year to satisfy me a bit. The rest of my family is probably going up to St. Louis this holiday season in hopes of seeing some (if airfares drop a bit... eeks they're high!). I'm so freakin' jealous."

Eleventh response, from Samantha to others (chiming in with an inspirational and supportive message):
"DITTO! I want some frickin' snow!! At least it will be cold which will be nice...Guess DH will get to enjoy the snow at 7000+ feet in the Spring. "

Twelfth response, from Katrina to . . . the cosmos? (in the final of three bizarre pseudo-soliloquies):
"That would explain why my seasonal eczema is flaring up in a major way right now. I've got a great scaly patch in my eyebrow - it was perfect for Halloween, now not so much."

Thirteenth response, Meghan closes in a reflective tone:
"Will try- I hate the little boogers. Lived in a house out in Martindale with them in the attic. Owner didn't seem to care, but they drove us NUTS all winter long, come spring I pull out a pair of boots to wear, and they were full of pecans. That was the last straw. Had to move after that (and many other creepy old house issues) I can see them from the couch in the morning, if I walk up to the door, they turn their backs and I just know they are whistling, insert musical notes here-doo doo doo, we're not doing anything, doo doo doo- like I can't see them Standing on my plants. Lucas would get a kick out of seeing a spicy squirrel dance, maybe I can get it on camera .. .thanks for all the responses mamas!"

Happy belated 2009.

To me, every new year seems less like a real year and more like a battery expiration date. Or at best, a sell by date on a can of refried beans . . . anything that once seemed like a distant and hypothetical concept, a future possibility that was otherwise fairly unlikely to be experienced directly.

I think there's a point in your life where each New Year’s Eve abandons the excitement of youth and crosses over into an unequivocally surreal feeling that monopolizes the emotion set. I’m guessing (hoping!) it’s just a glimpse at the irony of death.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

A Rare Subversive Plug

You probably suspected as much, but among all of our friends, I’m considered a stylish trendsetter of sorts. A tastemaker par excellence. I was wearing shoes like “TOMS” back in 2000, well before the company's founder could even distinguish between Madonna and Evita Peron. (Nevermind that I referred to them as French peasant shoes or that I think they first belonged to an 80 year old woman before I acquired them secondhand. I consider these pesky, inconsequential details.) And Smart cars? I drove a hybrid one to my senior prom.

So it should come as no surprise that, for the last couple of weeks, I’ve been getting urgent, almost frantic e-mails, phone calls, and unexpected visits from throngs of acquaintances who want to know what they should get their loved ones for Christmas. “What’s the next big thing, Sean?” . . . that’s the common refrain. Well, since I’m a busy man and need to save the hassle of interacting with all you plebes, I’m just going to post the inside info here so you’ll stop harassing me and wasting my time: treasure hunting is where it’s at. You heard me right – metal detectors are the next hot gadget fad. I've recently seen hordes of hipsters roaming the parks and street medians throughout the five boroughs of New York with these things. And you know what that means – next stop: Your Town, USA. To sweeten the deal, word on the street is that Apple is about to come out with its own iMetalDetector, just in time for last-minute Christmas shopping.

But if you can’t afford the touch screen version, you should at least check out a beginner's model at White’s Metal detectors. Their commercials are enlightening, to say the least – never afraid to confront the key metaphysical issues of our time (albeit in a deft and amazingly subtle manner). I could give you more details about their sleek interface and cutting edge functionality, but I couldn’t do them justice. They really just sell themselves – simply listen to the convincing words of some of their owners:

"One of America's fastest growing outdoor activities" . . . http://whiteselectronics.com/content/view/4797/520/

Ohh the stories you'll tell: http://whiteselectronics.com/content/view/4560/515/

Maybe the one I cherish most.-- a frank and insightful discussion with the the President of White's: http://whiteselectronics.com/content/view/4546/481/

And in case you're hungry for more, a full-length infomercial, including interviews with real life treasure hunters!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-nqK2exnC4&feature=related

I know what else you’re wondering: Where does he find such great gift ideas? How is he ALWAYS in THE KNOW? Well, I’m typically not disposed to give away my sources, but as an early, extra-special holiday treat -- a gift from me, the prescient Blogger, to you, my feeble but faithful follower -- I will divulge this one secret: The Family Channel. Get cable, watch it for commercials if nothing else, and the rest will take care of itself. Your heart will sing with inspiration, your mind will buzz with creativity. Ohh Disney Muse! Eisner was genius!

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Milk is a key ingredient in Ranch dressing. That's no coincidence.

Please read this fine article that I abridged from Gourmet.com; it's John T. Edge writing about the latest food craze that is sweeping the nation:

"I was 25 when I overdosed on ranch dressing, that kitschy combo of mayonnaise, herbs, and buttermilk or sour cream. I had eaten one too many salads of iceberg and shaved carrots, drenched in a torrent of anemic white nothingness. I had dunked a dirty barnyard of chickens into countless thimbles of blandness. Ranch was too much with me.

A decade and a half passed. I returned to the fold while seated at my father’s kitchen table. Struggling, like many a parent, to get my son to embrace the lettuce-and-cucumbers ideal, I noticed that, when my father cracked open a jar of store-bought ranch, my son dug deep into the roughage. So I followed his lead. Ranch, I learned, hadn’t gotten any better. But it seems that absence makes both the palate and the heart grow fonder.

More recently, I’ve noticed that chefs have been reacquainting themselves with ranch, too. And improving on the formula in the process. I’m not going to play the catalog-the-wild-ranch-iterations game. For that, you can consult this dispatch from Ideas in Food, or this article in Slate. And if, after perusing those pieces, you don’t recognize that ranch has made a comeback, then consider this dinner dispatch from Michael Bauer of the San Francisco Chronicle. Even the mighty Thomas Keller has embraced the possibilities: “The waiter presented the entire roasted abalone, which looked like a caramel-colored river rock. He then took it back to the kitchen where chewy/tender slices were arranged on a rectangular plate with a swipe of French Laundry Ranch dressing, a scattering of sea beans and bright orbs of peeled cherry tomatoes.”

On the other coast, my gourmet.com editor Christy Harrison raves about the ranch at “The Farm on Adderley, a place in Brooklyn that does the whole local-seasonal thing.” Closer to my home, John Currence of City Grocery, in Oxford, Mississippi, has been known to run a special of what he calls frog wings, which are, of course, frog legs, fried and doused in the manner of chicken wings, served with a side of buttermilk ranch.

Now that I’ve called it to your attention, I’m betting you’ll notice any number of ranch revivals. A couple weeks back, I sampled what may well be the best. I was at Cakes & Ale, a relatively new restaurant in Decatur, a suburb of Atlanta, Georgia. Okra, sliced longways, fried to a shattering crispness, [was] served, yes, with a bullet of buttermilk ranch that reminded me, somehow, of a decidedly American riff on Greek tsatsiki dressing. "

Since he is somewhat underwhelmed by Ranch, I can't say that Mr. Edge and I see eye-to-eye on this particular subject. It's no secret that I'm an unashamedly devout Ranch consumer. (And with good reason: some notable New Testament scholars have confirmed that, if the water into wine thing didn't work out for Jesus, he was going to try to turn water into Ranch dressing next.)

But note that Edge updated his verdict on Ranch dressing (only slightly) after eating the store-bought, jarred variety. What's wrong with this man? For purists among us, that's nothing short of a shock and an outrage! You can't judge a dressing by its store-bought simulation! He really needs to exercise better judgment in the future.

Moving on to what all this has to do with my daughter/revolutionary . . . As a father, am I supposed to think that mere chance can explain this phenomenon: milk, the main staple for an infant, is also the main ingredient for Ranch dressing? What one man calls chance, I call fate. So here's what I'm proposing to my wife as soon as she gets back from the gym tonight: as we prepare every bottle of milk for our new daughter, we start by adding a few healthy tablespoons of mayonnaise and a few generous dashes of Ranch seasoning. Voila -- a diet fit for a Titan.

Viewed in that light, mother's milk seems like a paltry source of nutrition for a kid to live on day after day after day. Why not add some minerals and protein and make it Ranch? The kid loses nothing; she only stands to win.

We already had three X chromosomes between us, what will another two in the house hurt?

You've probably heard, but a few weeks ago, we found out that we're expecting a girl. A cute, adorable, baby girl.

Monday, November 17, 2008

The Mother Lode

After recently posting the entry about my Birth Plan, I had to pause for some sincere and elaborate reflection on my own birth.

I only wish I could remember the first 24 hours after I began to exit the womb, but too many hard narcotics were involved. They hooked up Mom to some sort of intravenous drip, and very soon thereafter, I was hopped up on drugs, way too high to remember anything but the scantest of details. Naked, blood shot eyes, fidgety, face covered in my own slobber – but all of a sudden, I was surrounded by bright lights and masked/bespectacled people, and I was wailing at the hallucinatory and disorienting new reality. Was I a human in its larva stage, or a caterpillar dreaming to be a infant? Either way, it was not a gratifying scene . . . one of my grimmest, most desperate days to date.

But here’s the worst part: it was a c-section, so I wasn’t really “born.” There wasn't much "birthing" involved at all; more than anything, I guess I was extracted. It was like the hospital staff went on a mining expedition. (After all, in Waco in the 1980s, I think the doctors at the hospital actually were coal miners working the night shift for extra beer money. At some point, I’m pretty sure I received a swift blow to the temple from a pick axe.)

Forcefully (and surgically) divorced from the ceremonious passage into the world that most other humans experience, I was stripped of my dignity, left to question my very humanity. If I were perfectly honest, there are days when I’m still not sure that I truly, completely exist after not having been born. I’ve been coerced into this limbo, forever stuck in a weird hybrid anti-reality that I can only describe as somewhat similar to purgatory. In some ways, there can be no more grave a human rights abuse than preventing someone the right to be born, not allowed to fully experience the very process of becoming human.

I wish I could tell you that the drama ended there, but after my so-called “birth”, matters have only deteriorated. As it turns out, just because you’re delivered by a “Caesarean” procedure, that doesn’t mean you’re going to grow up to go gallivanting around in chariots, nor can you (legally) conquer/pillage Gaullist towns, and perhaps worst of all, you can’t even prance around sporting a laurel of gold-plated olive branches on your head. (Trust me, I’ve tried them all, and not once has the line “but I was delivered by Caesarean section” been received as an acceptable excuse). You can imagine how the whole shocking disappointment has taken some real adjustment, most of all for my mother, who was expecting her own Tirolean villa by now.